Eu pensei nisso. Tô achando que é a minha Realtek da eth0, será!?
:?
ifconfig:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:02:44:17:BF:F5
inet addr:200.150.189.xx Bcast:255.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.128
UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1651930 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1438863 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:326310737 (311.1 Mb) TX bytes:117687980 (112.2 Mb)
Interrupt:9 Base address:0xce00
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:7D:F8:FA:FA
inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1473945 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1680361 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:121515180 (115.8 Mb) TX bytes:329753040 (314.4 Mb)
Interrupt:11 Base address:0xf400
root@america:/# dmesg |grep eth
eth0: RealTek RTL8139 at 0xc28cce00, 00:02:44:17:bf:f5, IRQ 9
eth0: Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8139C'
eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x45E1
eth1: VIA VT6105 Rhine-III at 0xf400, 00:e0:7d:f8:fa:fa, IRQ 11.
eth1: MII PHY found at address 1, status 0x7869 advertising 05e1 Link 45e1.
eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x45E1
eth1: Setting full-duplex based on MII #1 link partner capability of 45e1.