+ Responder ao Tópico



  1. Eu estou enfrentando um batalha com o heartbeat ja mandei varias mensagem para a lista mas ate agora não consegui resolver meu problema aki esta o log o heartbeat mas esta parecendo que esta perdento pacote, sera que alguem podera me ajudar aki esta o log

    heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:56 info: Configuration validated. Starting
    >> heartbeat 1.0.2
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:56 info: nice_failback is in effect.
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:56 info: heartbeat: version 1.0.2
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:57 info: Heartbeat generation: 18
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:57 info: UDP Broadcast heartbeat started on
    >> port 694 (694) interface eth0
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:57 info: pid 5426 locked in memory.
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:57 info: pid 5427 locked in memory.
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:58 info: pid 5428 locked in memory.
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:58 info: Local status now set to: 'up'
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:58 info: pid 5424 locked in memory.
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:58 info: Link cpd009.agrovale:eth0 up.
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:58 info: Local status now set to: 'active'
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:58 info: Link cpd008.agrovale:eth0 up.
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:58 info: Status update for node
    >> cpd008.agrovale: status active
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:58 info: remote resource transition
    >> completed.
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:58 info: remote resource transition
    >> completed.
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:58 info: Local Resource acquisition
    >> completed.
    >> (none)
    >
    > aqui esta o problema.... esta perdendo pacotes!
    > inicio
    >
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:48:58 info: Running /etc/ha.d/rc.d/status status
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:49:14 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [309:311]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:49:14 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:50:18 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [341:343]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:50:18 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:50:40 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [352:354]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:50:40 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:50:56 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [360:362]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:50:56 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:51:02 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [363:365]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:51:02 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:52:31 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [407:409]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:52:33 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:52:55 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [419:421]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:52:55 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:53:57 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [450:452]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:53:57 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:54:19 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [461:463]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:54:19 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:54:55 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [479:481]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:54:55 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:55:08 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [485:487]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:55:08 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:55:14 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [488:490]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:55:18 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [490:492]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:55:20 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:56:08 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [515:517]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:56:08 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:56:26 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [524:526]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:56:26 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:56:50 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [536:538]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:56:50 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:56:58 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [540:542]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:56:58 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:57:14 WARN: 1 lost packet(s) for
    >> [cpd008.agrovale] [548:550]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:57:14 info: No pkts missing from
    >> cpd008.agrovale!
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:17 WARN: node cpd008.agrovale: is dead
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:17 WARN: No STONITH device configured.
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:17 WARN: Shared disks are not protected.
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:17 info: Resources being acquired from
    >> cpd008.agrovale.
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:17 info: Link cpd008.agrovale:eth0 dead.
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:17 info: Running /etc/ha.d/rc.d/status status
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:17 info: No local resources
    >> [/usr/lib/heartbeat/ResourceManager listkeys cpd009.agrovale]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:17 info: Resource acquisition completed.
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:17 info: Taking over resource group
    >> IPaddr::192.168.1.235
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:17 info: Acquiring resource group:
    >> cpd008.agrovale IPaddr::192.168.1.235 datadisk smb
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:17 info: Running /etc/ha.d/resource.d/IPaddr
    >> 192.168.1.235 start
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:17 info: /sbin/ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.1.235
    >> netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:17 info: Sending Gratuitous Arp for
    >> 192.168.1.235 on eth0:0 [eth0]
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:17 /usr/lib/heartbeat/send_arp eth0
    >> 192.168.1.235 00112F6D9CE2 192.168.1.235 ffffffffffff
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:17 info: Running
    >> /etc/ha.d/resource.d/datadisk
    >> start
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:19 /usr/lib/heartbeat/send_arp eth0
    >> 192.168.1.235 00112F6D9CE2 192.168.1.235 ffffffffffff
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:21 /usr/lib/heartbeat/send_arp eth0
    >> 192.168.1.235 00112F6D9CE2 192.168.1.235 ffffffffffff
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:23 /usr/lib/heartbeat/send_arp eth0
    >> 192.168.1.235 00112F6D9CE2 192.168.1.235 ffffffffffff
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:25 /usr/lib/heartbeat/send_arp eth0
    >> 192.168.1.235 00112F6D9CE2 192.168.1.235 ffffffffffff
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:28 warning: Return code 255 from
    >> /etc/ha.d/resource.d/datadisk
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:28 info: Running /etc/init.d/smb start
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:28 info: /usr/lib/heartbeat/mach_down:
    >> nice_failback: acquiring foreign resources
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:28 info: mach_down takeover complete.
    >> heartbeat: 2005/04/22_20:58:28 info: mach_down takeover complete for node
    >> cpd008.agrovale.

  2. versao 1.0.2 do Heartbeat é antiga não?

    Verifique se o cabo está bem crimpado.

    Pode ser problema no cabeamento.

    ë um link dedicado entre as maquinas?

    []'s

    Marcos Pitanga



  3. Eu atualizei para o heartbeat 1.0.3, mas mesmo assim continua com problemas eu estou usando um rede a 100M.

  4. Citação Postado originalmente por gilmarcabral
    Eu atualizei para o heartbeat 1.0.3, mas mesmo assim continua com problemas eu estou usando um rede a 100M.
    Novamente:

    O link para o heartbeat é dedicado?
    Já testou com outro cabo?

    []s

    Marcos Pitanga






Tópicos Similares

  1. Mistério - Perdendo pacotes quando navega.
    Por SgtoMarlthon no fórum Redes
    Respostas: 10
    Último Post: 07-01-2008, 07:28
  2. Respostas: 8
    Último Post: 21-10-2007, 18:37
  3. link com ovislink 5000 perdendo pacotes
    Por scnet no fórum Redes
    Respostas: 9
    Último Post: 25-06-2007, 13:59
  4. Cliente a 80 metros perdendo pacotes
    Por marcelomg no fórum Redes
    Respostas: 0
    Último Post: 24-04-2007, 12:35
  5. AP2000 com wds perdendo pacotes
    Por xandemartini no fórum Redes
    Respostas: 8
    Último Post: 17-04-2006, 14:05

Visite: BR-Linux ·  VivaOLinux ·  Dicas-L